After searching for websites about depression (‘‘depression,’’ ‘‘depression treatment,’’ and ‘‘depression help’’) with a popular search engine: Google, the authors of this work carefully examined the websites. The websites were evaluated on accountability, interactivity, esthetics, readability and content quality. They also used the brief DISCERN as a content quality indicator for general consumers. They found 58 sites from which 13 were excluded: 8 were not websites, 3 were blogs or
discussion forum, 1 required an access login, and 1 was inaccessible.
They analyzed 45 websites, the overall quality of the websites about depression was good. Those with a high score on the brief DISCERN, the presence of HON label (The Health On the Net Foundation (HON) ) and affiliation of the website were all related to high quality.
These 10 websites scored highest on the brief DISCERN and content quality:
- http://www.medicinenet.com/depression/article.htm
- http://www.netdoctor.co.uk/depression/index.shtml
- http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/default.aspx?page50
- http://www.mind.org.uk/Information/Booklets/Understanding/Understanding1depression.htm
- http://www.webmd.com/depression/
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_depression
- http://www.utdol.com/patients/content/topic.do?topicKey=~jSS5Z_cMxYvi6
- http://depression.about.com/
- http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/center_index.php?id55
- http://concernedcounseling.com/communities/Depression/related/self_help.asp
This research was done in February 2009.
![]()
Zermatten, A., Khazaal, Y., Coquard, O., Chatton, A., & Bondolfi, G. (2010). Quality of web-based information on depression Depression and Anxiety DOI: 10.1002/da.20665
Popularity: 3% [?]
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.



Interesting to see Wikipedia in the list. Good to learn again that it’s working and isn’t all about vandalised politicians and libelled celebs.
[...] Go to Publisher to continue reading [...]